Secession is an important concept to think about and discuss as a Libertarian. But why is it so crucial? The reason lies in the idea that when someone secedes, they are physically leaving one situation or institution to pursue something they value more – something they currently lack.
Historically, secession reflects a desire for sovereignty and freedom. Consider the colonists who wrote the Declaration of Independence to secede from Britain, or the Southern states that modeled their secession from the North on that same declaration. Both sought sovereignty: the ability to live freely, unburdened by oppressive taxes or forced compliance with the will of others.
This desire is not uncommon. Humans naturally seek both freedom and security. Some may prefer the safety provided by established laws to protect individuals from forces beyond their control. But does safety come from laws, or from the strength to counter potential threats? To understand the Libertarian perspective, we must explore these questions and acknowledge the inconsistencies in two key American examples of secession.
Secession in the American Revolution
The Founders seceded from England because the mercantile system restricted their freedoms. Despite being an ocean away and largely self-sufficient, they were not sovereign. England’s laws forced colonists to trade only with England, taxing their goods and imposing tariffs that stifled economic freedom. These burdens became unbearable, and the colonists chose to rebel against what they saw as exploitation.
The same principle applies to slavery in the South: both situations involved oppression. The colonists seceded from England by declaring independence, pledging their lives, fortunes, and honor to reclaim their sovereignty. This act was not unique; throughout history, oppressed groups have often rebelled to regain their autonomy. Such forceful rebellion, however, is not an ideal Libertarian solution.
Ironically, after the Revolution, the thirteen sovereign colonies faced a new challenge. They had accumulated war debt that needed repayment. Initially, the Articles of Confederation allowed each colony to remain independent while loosely participating in a confederation. However, this system failed to ensure the repayment of debts, forcing a shift.
To resolve this, the colonies relinquished their sovereignty to form a centralized government under the Constitution of the United States, with an elected President, Congress, and appointed Supreme Court. While this system promised unity, it effectively placed the nation back in a situation reminiscent of British rule. Sovereignty was sacrificed, and liberty diminished.
Representation and Sovereignty
The claim that people maintain sovereignty through elected representatives is misleading. In a republic, one representative speaks for many individuals with differing viewpoints. When voting, the representative chooses only one perspective, often prioritizing the majority view to secure re-election. This dynamic favors the representative’s self-interest over genuine representation, exacerbated by corruption and the influence of money in politics.
For Libertarians, this raises critical questions. Is it right to force individuals to live contrary to their conscience? A Libertarian believes people should face the consequences or benefits of their choices but should never live as slaves to others’ will.
Secession and Libertarian Values
Secession is fundamental to Libertarianism because it precedes sovereignty. Sovereignty—the supreme power to govern oneself—is at the heart of Libertarian philosophy. When individuals or groups secede from oppressive systems, they reclaim the power to determine their own lives. It is akin to a divorce: ending a relationship no longer rooted in mutual benefit or respect.
Libertarians advocate for this freedom not just for themselves but for everyone. This freedom, however, must not oppress others or deny their sovereignty. Secession restores autonomy and enables individuals to live according to their values, fostering a society where mutual respect thrives.
The Contradiction of Force and Peace
Government systems often rely on force to maintain peace, a contradiction worth examining. Ronald Reagan once argued that superior force ensures peace, and history shows that people comply when faced with overwhelming power. This applies not only to enemies but also to citizens. Recognizing this truth underscores the importance of exploring alternatives to force-driven governance.
Libertarianism offers a philosophy that promotes liberty and peace through voluntary cooperation and mutual respect. It is a path that requires thought and conversation to understand and implement.
Encouraging Libertarian Conversations
This website exists to spark conversations about Libertarian ideas. These concepts may seem strange to many because they challenge deeply ingrained beliefs about governance. But thoughtful discussion can reveal how Libertarian principles might lead to greater freedom and peace.
If you’re hesitant to voice your Libertarian views, consider wearing them instead. Our store offers items designed to inspire conversations about liberty and sovereignty. By wearing these ideas out loud, you can contribute to spreading awareness and fostering dialogue.
America needs this discussion now more than ever. True liberty begins with respectful conversations that honor differing opinions. Let’s think, talk, and work together to build a freer, more peaceful society.
L